We’re expanding our Encyclopedia of Jewish Women and we need your help! Know an extraordinary Jewish woman whose story should be told? Nominate her to be included!
Close [x]

Show [+]


You are here

Share Share Share Share Share Share Share

Shelomith 1: Midrash and Aggadah

by Tamar Kadari

The Rabbis describe Shelomith daughter of Dibri as being good-looking, and her name attests that she was perfect (shelemah) and flawless (Tanhuma, Shemot, para. 9). Alternately, she was talkative, and she was called “daughter of Dibri [bat Dibri]” because she would talk (le-daber) incessantly with everyone and would greet every individual with: “Shalom to you,” thus explaining her name: Shelomith. Some Rabbis blame her loquaciousness for her engaging in forbidden sexual relations, which resulted in the birth of a son who was doomed to die (Lev. Rabbah 32:5).

The Rabbis maintain that the phenomenon during the Egyptian servitude of Israelite women being married to Egyptians was rare, and the specific mention of the forging of such a bond with Shelomith teaches how exceptional this instance was. The Rabbis note that Israel were redeemed from Egypt for four reasons: (1) they did not change their Hebrew names while in Egypt; (2) they did not change their language, but continued to speak in Hebrew; (3) they did not engage in slander, and no one informed on his fellow Israelite; and (4) they did not engage in licentious behavior. Shelomith daughter of Dibri was the exception mentioned by the Torah that proved the rule of Israelite marital fidelity (Lev. Rabbah 32:5).

A number of midrashim stress that although Shelomith’s son was the child of an Egyptian man, she was not married to her son’s father, and the entire incident is presented (from her perspective) as a sorry mistake. The Egyptian taskmasters would wake the Hebrews at the crack of dawn every morning for their slave labor. To do this, the taskmasters would enter the houses of the Israelites. When one of the taskmasters entered Shelomith’s tent, he was struck by her beauty and desired her. One dawn, after the taskmaster had sent her husband to his daily labor, he returned to Shelomith and lay with her; in the darkness, Shelomith thought that he was her husband. When Shelomith’s husband returned, he saw the Egyptian taskmaster leaving his house. He asked her: “Did he touch you?,” to which she replied: “Yes, and I thought that was you” (Ex. Rabbah 1:28). Another tradition relates that Shelomith would return the taskmaster’s greeting; he became acquainted with her, and consequently demanded that she sin with him—a request to which she readily acquiesced (Sekhel Tov [ed. Buber], Ex. 2:11). The taskmaster knew that Shelomith’s husband sensed this and so, when the latter returned to his slave labor, the taskmaster beat the husband. This taskmaster was the Egyptian whom Moses saw when he went out to his kinsfolk, as related in Ex. 2:11–12. Moses witnessed, by the spirit of Divine inspiration, what the taskmaster had done to the Hebrew man, and he said: “Is it not enough that you have wronged his wife, you also strike him?” Realizing that the taskmaster deserved the death penalty, Moses struck him a fatal blow (Ex. Rabbah loc. cit.).

According to another tradition, the Egyptians would defile the wives of the Israelites. Shelomith was married to a man from her tribe of Dan. That night Pharaoh’s taskmasters came and killed her husband and then engaged in relations with her; a son was born from this encounter. Everything follows the seed: from sweet to sweet, and from bitter to bitter. Consequently, this child, the offspring of an Egyptian from an act of defilement, cursed the Lord (Pirkei de-Rabbi Eliezer, chap. 47). Lev. 24:11 provides his detailed genealogy: “Now his mother’s name was Shelomith daughter of Dibri of the tribe of Dan,” because this son was a disgrace to his mother, to his family and to his tribe (Lev. Rabbah 32:5).

What was the quarrel that led Shelomith’s son to curse the Lord? In the Rabbinic account, he converted and wanted to pitch his tent within the encampment of Dan. The Danites asked him: “Why do you want to have your tent here?” He replied: “I am from the daughters of Dan.” They retorted: “But Scripture says: ‘The Israelites shall camp each with his standard, under the banners of his father’s house’ [Num. 2:2]. Although your mother is from the daughters of Dan, your father is not from the sons of Dan, and the encampment follows the father’s line, and not the mother’s.” Shelomith’s son entered the court of Moses and asked for a judgment in his case. Moses ruled against him, declaring that he could not dwell among the Danites because he was a mamzer (bastard). The son left the court and blasphemed, using the fully-pronounced Name of the Holy One, which he had heard at Sinai (Sifra 14:1–2). This midrash is highly critical of the conduct of Moses and the Danites. Shelomith’s son tried to mend his ways: he converted and wanted to be part of his tribe, but they cast out the “Other” from their midst on the flimsiest of excuses. His isolation within society and the unwillingness of his tribe to accept him drove him to the extreme act of blasphemy, which resulted in his death.

A different tradition, however, praises Moses’s conduct in this situation. Moses knew that the son was a mamzer, but he did not divulge this to a soul, until the truth came out on its own during this episode (T Eduyot 3:4).

1 Comment

In spite of my goy name, I was not raised a Christian and have been in the community for a long time.

Reading Torah, Lev 24:10-15, the story of Shelomith and " prounoncing the Name ", I followed up.

Other parts of Torah command us to " swear by the Name of - the Holy One, in essence to use the actual Holy Name as opposed to ADNOI; however, here the individual, goyim or Israeli is commanded not to pronounce the Name ( ? ). Which is which ?

There are differing versions (as stated above) about this event. The Midrash is "highly critical" of Moshe for such harsh treatment of boy with a Jewish mother, that, by this account, the boy made a good faith effort to do toushuva (ms), be incompliance with the Laws of G-d, etc.

What is the likelyhood of this version being the correct one? Assuming the story is the correct version, and asssuming the boy was sincere in his desire to serve G-d and tried to become part of the community, was that not really harsh and unjust treatment of a kid ?

Someone help me with this ! A big thank you !


How to cite this page

Kadari, Tamar. "Shelomith 1: Midrash and Aggadah." Jewish Women: A Comprehensive Historical Encyclopedia. 1 March 2009. Jewish Women's Archive. (Viewed on March 21, 2019) <https://jwa.org/encyclopedia/article/shelomith-1-midrash-and-aggadah>.


Help us elevate the voices of Jewish women.

donate now

The JWA Podcast

listen now

Sign Up for JWA eNews


Discover Education Programs

Join our growing community of educators.

view programs