You are here

Share Share Share Share Share Share Share

Natalie Portman has got a point

Natalie Portman raised some eyebrows last week when she stated that she avoids Jewish roles, romantic comedies, and playing the "sex object," in an interview with Elle magazine. I, for one, was watching to see if there would be blow-back from the Jewish community, perhaps offended that she didn't like playing Jewish characters. Rather than reflect poorly on Portman's Jewish identity, however, her interview brought to light some upsetting realities about roles for women, and Jewish women, in Hollywood.

"I’ve always tried to stay away from playing Jews. I get like 20 Holocaust scripts a month, but I hate the genre," Portman said.  She gets 20 Holocaust scripts a month, but apparently none featuring Jewish characters in other genres. She avoids Jewish roles because they are exclusively Holocaust roles. Jessica Grose sums it up nicely at Double X.

I don't think she's a self-loather who doesn't want movie audiences to know she's Jewish (though she benefits from looks that are not stereotypically Semitic—her nose is small, her hair is straight). It's more that she's lamenting the lack of good Jewish roles outside of Holocaust movies. There, she has a point.

In the past ten years, I can think of only two non-Holocaust movies in which the female protagonist was explicitly Jewish: Two Lovers and Kissing Jessica Stein. It's worth noting that both these films were independent productions, and that in Two Lovers, Vinessa Shaw's Jewish character was meant to be less attractive than Gwyneth Paltrow's character, who is a shiksa (though in real life both Paltrow and Shaw are at least part Jewish). I literally cannot think of a single major studio picture with a Jewish heroine from the aughts...

Last night I watched Funny People starring a slew of Jewish actors (Adam Sandler, Seth Rogen, Jonah Hill, Jason Schwartzman) who have been seen in comedies, romantic comedies, dramas, and the new genre du jour, "bromance."  Tablet's memorable piece, "Gentleman Prefer Blondes," reminds us that traditionally, Jewish men play opposite the non-Jewish (or "shiksa") girl.  Funny People is no exception.  Dirty Dancing is one of the only films I can think of in which the female lead is both dynamic and desireable -- and she plays opposite a non-Jewish man! (Do we ever see Jew on Jew love?)

And now, with the influx of "bromances" -- comedies like I Love You, Man that feature male on male friendship as the primary relationship -- women are reduced to supporting roles.  (I Love You, Man happens to star Paul Rudd and Jason Segal, both Jewish.) Portman touches on this issue as well:  "It wasn't that I didn't want to do comedy. It's just that I would only get offered girlfriend parts in guy comedies, which aren't exciting to me, or those offensive roles in romantic comedies where the woman has to have a job in fashion so that she can have nice clothes, and her goal is always marriage."  Instead of "bromances," women get films like Bride Wars, Devil Wears Prada, and Mean Girls, that teach us that friendship is something to be traded for clothes, jobs, wedding dates, or popularity.

I am not the first or only to argue that there needs to be better roles for women in Hollywood. The only genre left in which women can play dynamic, strong, characters appears to be drama, and unfortunately for us, dramas don't make big money at the box office.  As this Washington Post article notes, a changing business model may mean the reduction of the one genre left for Jewish women like Natalie Portman.  Director Nora Ephron may have accomplished something with Julie & Julia last year, but I am waiting for "Rachel & Rebecca." Starring Rachel Weisz and, of course, Natalie Portman.

Visit JWA to learn more about Jewish women in Hollywood.

Share Share Share Share Share Share Share

Ano-nimo, I don't know if, when you say "jew men with jew women", you are talking about the ''actors'' or the ''characters''. This line is blurred quite often in writings about this topic. If you're talking about actors, though, there are Jewish-on-Jewish pairings all the time. You just have to look for them.

In the last two years or so... Anton Yelchin with Kat Dennings (Charlie Bartlett), Paul Rudd with Rashida Jones (I Love You, Man), Zac Efron with Nikki Blonsky in Hairspray (well, Blonsky was raised Catholic, but her father is Jewish), Zac Efron again with Michelle Trachtenberg (17 Again), Jeremy Piven with Jordana Spiro (The Goods), Gabriel Macht with Scarlett Johansson in The Spirit (though that character had a lot of love interests), Jake Gyllenhaal with Natalie Portman (Brothers), and Jesse Eisenbeg with Margarita Levieva in Adventureland (both were playing non-Jews, but Eisenberg's character ended up with a Jewish character played by a non-Jewish actress! Makes your head spin).

I totally agree with you!

Why don't we see on screen more jew men with jew women? Are they trying to say something? I believe they are trying to be self-racist, for not appreciating their own women.

Subscribe to Jewish Women, Amplified and get notifications sent to your email.

How to cite this page

Berkenwald, Leah. "Natalie Portman has got a point." 11 January 2010. Jewish Women's Archive. (Viewed on January 18, 2018) <>.


Help us elevate the voices of Jewish women.

donate now

The JWA Podcast

listen now


Who is your favorite historical Jewish feminist named Emma?

Sign Up for JWA eNews



17 hr
Get ready for Tu BiSh'vat with this reflective excerpt from Abigail Pogrebin's book about Jewish holidays.
17 hr
We couldn't resist clicking on this.... 😆
19 hr
We're seeing lots of conversations around consensual-ish and consensual sex that's still bad and demeaning--so we'r…