Androgyny: progressive or exclusionary?

Hiroko Masuike for The New York Times

The New York Times recently identified androgyny as the "it" fashion trend.  It seemed to begin with "skinny jeans" -- skin-tight pants quickly adopted by fashion-forward men and women.  Unisex hoodies, coats, footwear, t-shirts, and hairstyles were soon to follow.  While women dressing in masculine clothing is old hat (the tomboy), the idea of heterosexual men dressing in feminine clothing is new, edgy, and raising eyebrows as well as questions about traditional gender norms.  The New York Times writes:

During the 1970s, arguably the last time sartorial gender blending was as pervasive in the culture, it grew in part from the kind of feminist thinking that suggested girls play with Lego sets and boys play with dolls. “Now we have something new,” said Diane Ehrensaft, a psychologist in Oakland, who writes about gender. That something is not necessarily about one’s politics or sexual orientation or, she added pointedly, “about one’s core identity as a male or female.”

What Dr. Ehrensaft has dubbed “gender fluidity” remains in her view a form of rebellion. It suggests, she said, that “younger people no longer accept the standard boxes. They won’t be bound by boys having to wear this or girls wearing that. I think there is a peer culture in which that kind of gender blurring is not only acceptable but cool.”

As a participant in this somewhat generational trend, I have thought a great deal about fashion and gender.  On one level, I love that we are headed in a unisex, gender-free direction.  Now, both men, women, and everyone in between, have more freedom to dress as they please.  It has been particularly fun to watch androgynous teens challenge school dress codes -- a tool often used to police gender in the name of reducing "distractions" in the classroom. As more and more teens sport skinny jeans, hoodies, and unisex hairstyles, a dress code that differentiates between boys and girls will become increasingly irrelevant.  Marlo Thomas and Letty Cottin Pogrebin would be so proud. 

This type of gender fluidity has the potential to revolutionize common understandings of gender.  The majority of heterosexual, gender-conforming people have no reason to seek knowledge of gender theory, and as a result, the traditional binary perpetuates.  The idea of a gender-bending, heterosexual, mainstream forces people to confront their own, internalized prejudices about masculinity and femininity, a process which could increase awareness and acceptance of trans and gender queer communities.  But unfortunately, some aspects of androgyny in fashion are problematic.

For many, androgynous fashion is inaccessible.  Simply put, not all bodies can participate in this trend.  In order to pull off the androgynous look, you need to be fairly flat-chested and very thin.  For many Jewish women (stereotypically seen as full-bodied and big-breasted) androgyny can be hard to achieve. Of course I do not wish to generalize (Molly Picon and Barbra Streisand prove that Jewish women can look convincing as an adolescent boy), but the reality is that lots of Jewish and non-Jewish women have breasts and hips, and need clothing that accommodates their curves.  Can curvy women still participate in the gender revolution, or do our genetics exclude us?  Androgyny is exciting and progressive when it comes to gender, but can be oppressive for women facing weight and body image issues.

An gender-blurring American Apparel ad via The New York Times

American Apparel, an iconic brand featuring unisex clothing, exemplifies how the thinness required of androgyny can lead to discrimination.  As the crew from Jezebel demonstrates in this video, most American Apparel clothes are not meant to be worn by average-sized bodies.  According to a letter from a disgruntled employee, CEO and skeezeball Dov Charney requires photographs of employees so he can weed out those who are overweight and therefore unfit to promote the company's aesthetic.  American Apparel, infamous for it's sexist and objectifying ads, is obviously an extreme case. Most unisex clothing lines have not committed these atrocious crimes against women, but the general aesthetic still promotes a level of thinness that is unhealthy for many women.  In effect, androgyny is the new "heroin chic." 

This is problematic for all women, and perhaps even more so for Jewish women.  As we have explored in previous posts, eating disorders are a serious issue in the Jewish community.  As I discussed in an earlier post, Jewish women have traditionally confronted pressure to achieve the "American" standard of beauty (tall, thin, and blonde).  A hot fashion trend that requires women to look like adolescent boys is not going to help.  It is also important to recognize that it is equally difficult for men who are not tall, thin, or "boyish," to achieve androgyny.

So what can we conclude about androgyny?  That it is good for challenging traditional ideas about gender, but bad for women?  Personally, I am too excited about its potential to explode gender norms to want to condemn it outright. (Has any high fashion trend ever been friendly to "real" women?)  As someone who wore men's cargo pants for years, I am excited that androgyny now affords men the freedom to transcend gender conventions in a similar manner. 

What do you think?  Is androgyny progressive or exclusionary?

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and email addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Androgyny shouldn't something that's "pulled off". Having an eye in the future will make this easier. Just imagine you're living in a world where gender-roles have vanished. Now- whoever you are- try to be free of what others think and act/dress according to what you want others to think- of course with whatever you have. But what you have to begin with shouldn't matter and you should just be proud of it. Androgyny should be about acceptance- not exclusion. It shouldn't be just some mere fad with rules and regulations.

I think it's just a fad, and it will just change to something else eventually.

More and more fashion designers are putting out various forms of feminine apparel for men. I wholehearted agree with their decisions. Men have been placed in a box with fashion. There is only so much you can do with pants, shirts and shorts. Face it there is no creativity there. Where as women are allowed to wear a whole host of apparel. To wit dresses, skirts, skorts, gowns, pants, shorts, panties etc, etc. Men need to express their feminine side but has been stifled repeatedly by para-military organizations or self righteous groups in the name of God. Even the school systems in this country attempt to suppress individual creativity or expression. THIS HAS GOT TO STOP The fact that a man or boy can wear any of the aforementioned items of apparel without rebuke is rediculous. Some males look just as good in a dress or skirt as a female looks good in pants and a shirt. I wear skirts and skorts, they have added to my choices of what to wear on any given day. A navy blue skort with a light grey shirt (polo) along with socks and shoes or with sandals is quite comfortable. I have worn them to the stores, to the park and sometimes just out walking about. It did not cause a distraction as claimed by school officials as I've had to walk by a school. Women have made compliments to me as to my choices. SO WHERE IS THE PROBLEM. There isn't any, except for those who are narrow minded or blind to the obvious.

I love androgyny! I think it's the wave of the future, and in a few years it will be the milestone that seems to divide the styles of the 20th century with those of the 21st.

I think we should go even further to allow men to wear skirts and dresses. And that will come in time.

Right now, it's fun to mix masculine and feminine fashions to achieve this sexy mix that's strong for a girl, and soft for a man. In the future we will loose that, but we will gain so much more.

Eventually we will raise boys and girls to be more nuetral until they get to their teen years and even then things will be more fluid. It seem healthy to me.

How to cite this page

Berkenwald, Leah. "Androgyny: progressive or exclusionary?." 24 November 2009. Jewish Women's Archive. (Viewed on June 5, 2023) <>.

Read the latest from JWA from your inbox.

sign up now