after seeing the comment from a family member, I looked to the article for a citation or at least some source of basis for the statement that the families were estranged. there is none. so why would that be the assumption? because they converted from Judaism? sorry but that's dumb. in fact, it's generally frowned upon to include personal biases or editorializing in the context of an "encyclopedia entry"
after seeing the comment from a family member, I looked to the article for a citation or at least some source of basis for the statement that the families were estranged. there is none. so why would that be the assumption? because they converted from Judaism? sorry but that's dumb. in fact, it's generally frowned upon to include personal biases or editorializing in the context of an "encyclopedia entry"