By the way, the photo accompanying the article is particularly disturbing. A flattish amorphous behind, coupled with pudgy sides, and cheesy tinseled underwear that look like they were hand sewn by someone's great aunt. Not-to-mention the underwear are sagging toward the middle, which even further highlights the allusive or nonexistent buttocks. It looks more like the ass of a 12 year-old boy, than a woman. Very unsexy. Could you not have found a more suitable photo? Something more congruent with the notion of hotness? This cannot be the ideal of the much "obsessed" over and "fetishized" Jewish hottie, can it? Or perhaps, as I stated in my earlier post, it's all just imaginary.
By the way, the photo accompanying the article is particularly disturbing. A flattish amorphous behind, coupled with pudgy sides, and cheesy tinseled underwear that look like they were hand sewn by someone's great aunt. Not-to-mention the underwear are sagging toward the middle, which even further highlights the allusive or nonexistent buttocks. It looks more like the ass of a 12 year-old boy, than a woman. Very unsexy. Could you not have found a more suitable photo? Something more congruent with the notion of hotness? This cannot be the ideal of the much "obsessed" over and "fetishized" Jewish hottie, can it? Or perhaps, as I stated in my earlier post, it's all just imaginary.