|
|
|
Radical or
Traditional?
|
In the last zigzagging process of world
advancement in America, the Jewish men took their
wives and daughters by the hand, led them into
family pews and left them there...
|

source | full image
|
The late nineteenth century saw Jewish men yielding
their traditional responsibility for religious
observance to women. Council members took
their new role seriously. They hoped to combat the
growing trend of assimilation among American Jews with
a renewed commitment to Jewish family life.
Study Circles were a key part of their plan. Women's
religious education in the Jewish community was still
a radical idea at the turn of the century. But as
Solomon and others argued, how could a mother make a
traditional Jewish home when she was ignorant of her
own culture? Council depicted and believed in its
radical step as a means of renewing tradition instead
of breaking new ground.
While Solomon was one
of the first women to speak from a synagogue pulpit,
she still agreed to leave issues of religious
authority to men. She did not question the rabbis who
praised Council's efforts to renew Judaism while still
dictating the meaning of its traditions. Instead
Solomon invited the rabbis to lead Study Circles.
Even as they boldly trespassed onto new ground,
Solomon and the early NCJW maintained that a Jewish
woman's greatest power was through influence, not
authority.
|
Notes
|
Next—Controversy
|
|
How to Cite This Page
For a bibliography:
Jewish Women's Archive. "JWA - Hannah GreenebaumRadical or Traditional?." <http://jwa.org/exhibits/wov/solomon/hs9.html>.
For a footnote:
Jewish Women's Archive, "JWA - Hannah GreenebaumRadical or Traditional?," <http://jwa.org/exhibits/wov/solomon/hs9.html>.
|