The mikveh is a ritual bath designed for the Jewish rite of purification. The mikveh is not merely a pool of water; it must be composed of stationary, not flowing, waters and must contain a certain percentage of water derived from a natural source, such as a lake, an ocean, or rain. Both men and women have used the mikveh for ritual purification, but it has always held special significance for Jewish women. Jewish law prescribes that women immerse themselves in the waters of the mikveh following their menstrual periods or after childbirth in order to become ritually pure and permitted to resume sexual activity. The observance of this ritual has declined in modern times, but still remains an important element in the ritual practice of many Jewish women. In the United States, where most Jewish women have not observed the laws of menstrual purity, the mikveh continues to be an important institution of Jewish life. The uses and interpretations of the mikveh have evolved and changed along with the acculturation and modern sensibilities of contemporary Jewish women.
Before the destruction of the Temple, when ritual purity was intimately connected with the Land of Israel and Temple practices, the laws of purity and impurity (tumah and taharah) were much more far-reaching than in contemporary times. Ritual impurity might result from contact with the dead, loss of menstrual blood, loss of semen through nocturnal emission, or leprosy. Immersion in the waters of the mikveh provided a means of transforming an individual (male or female) from a state of ritual impurity to a state of purity. After the Destruction of the Temple, the rabbis curtailed most of the laws of purity, but elaborated those laws applying to women and menstruation. The laws of niddah, which determine the ritual status of a menstruating woman and the prescriptions for her sexual behavior, derive from biblical prohibitions regarding contact with a menstruant. The book of Leviticus declared that a woman would be ritually impure for seven days during her menstrual flow, during which time sexual contact was forbidden. The rabbis increased the period of sexual separation to twelve days, prescribing five days minimum for the menstrual flow and seven “clean” days afterward. Following that twelve-day period, the niddah, the menstruating woman, would immerse herself in the mikveh and then be permitted to resume sexual activity. Within the corpus of Jewish law, the observance of niddah is one of the three key mitzvot (commandments) incumbent upon Jewish women.
Women’s state of impurity during their menstrual periods is not a matter of hygienic cleanliness but rather a legal definition of ritual purity. Nevertheless, the laws of niddah reflect primitive blood taboos and the sense of fear and danger surrounding menstruation. Moreover, the rabbis interpreted the laws of niddah within a broader framework known as taharat hamishpahah, the laws of family purity. As the term implies, Jewish law transformed women’s observance of niddah into a duty that affected the entire family. Safeguarding the purity of other family members as well as regulating sexual behavior thus became primarily the responsibility of Jewish women. Jewish literature is filled with threats of punishment for intercourse during niddah, including assertions that children conceived during menstruation might be born with serious health impairments.
These laws were considered so critical that a Jewish community with limited resources was directed by the Talmud to prioritize the construction of a mikveh over that of a synagogue. The archeological excavations of Masada demonstrate that even while under siege by the Romans in a place where water was scarce, the Jews built mikvehs. Two mikvehs were found, each to the exact specifications mandated by halakhah.
In the modern period, Jews have reinterpreted and reassessed the laws of niddah. While some Reformers called for the abolition of such practices as backward and superstitious, modern Orthodox leaders, such as Samson Raphael Hirsch (1808–1888), extolled the virtues of periodic sexual abstinence as a means of moral and spiritual elevation. The personal and private nature of adherence to the laws of family purity makes it particularly difficult to determine accurately how many Jews continued to observe the practice. However, evidence suggests that Jewish women in the modern period gradually left behind the traditional regulations of niddah.
Jewish immigrants to the United States appeared to have largely abandoned the practice of niddah, but many communities in America continued to construct mikvehs. As early as 1759 in New York and 1784 in Philadelphia, small Jewish communities began building mikvehs, imploring local Jews not to neglect the laws of family purity. Throughout the nineteenth century, several congregations throughout America made the building of a mikveh a priority, indicating that communal leaders wanted to encourage the practice of niddah and at least some women continued to observe family purity. In the early twentieth century, New York’s Lower East Side housed over thirty ritual baths, some sponsored by synagogues and others independently owned. Yet, despite the continuing existence of mikvehs in America, Jewish leaders consistently lamented women’s indifference to the laws of ritual purity and seemed to be addressing a population in which most Jews had ceased to observe the practice.
While niddah remained one of the least observed Jewish rituals, Jewish leaders continued to publish prescriptive literature urging women to return to the traditional practice of ritual purity. In a modern American context, defenses of family purity shifted from an emphasis upon adherence to Jewish law to a new interest in the medical and hygienic benefits of niddah. Particularly during the first decades of the twentieth century, during the heyday of scientific positivism and eugenics, Jewish authors relied upon the findings of an emerging scientific literature, claiming that sexual abstinence during a woman’s menstrual flow decreased rates of cancer and contributed to the overall health of the Jewish people. Armed with medical evidence indicating lower rates of cancer among Jewish women and supporting the purportedly unique capabilities of the mikveh to dispel menstrual toxins, Jewish commentators argued that observance of niddah was a modern, scientifically sound practice. Leo Jung (1892–1987), a modern Orthodox rabbi who sought to lay out “Orthodoxy’s relevance to modern urban America,” wrote a guide to “the Jewish way to married happiness,” in which he reformulated the laws of family purity as “proto-feminist” guidelines to which he attributed both emotional and conjugal benefits (Joselit, Wonders 21). While such defenses never succeeded in convincing Jewish women to embrace traditional Jewish practice, they do reflect the ways that niddah and mikveh were reinterpreted in accordance with modern scientific culture. The supposed health benefits of niddah remain a part of contemporary Jewish discourse about niddah, but they generally receive much more limited attention, as a fringe benefit of family purity, not its primary intent or result.
The emergence of Jewish feminism in the 1970s brought another reconsideration of the laws of family purity and the use of the mikveh. Some Jewish feminists urged women to cast off the restrictions imposed by Jewish law and its emphasis on women’s biologic functions, but others reclaimed the practice of niddah as a feminist ritual. Arguing that periods of sexual abstinence enhanced the companionate bond in marriage and that the practice of niddah celebrated the cycle of the female body, some Jewish feminists have embraced niddah as a vehicle for women’s spiritual renewal and the mikveh as a place devoted exclusively to women’s needs. Many of the new rituals surrounding the mikveh celebrate female biological functions, but go far beyond the mikveh’s traditional association with sexual intimacy to encompass the spectrum of women’s experience. Women have not only created new rituals to accompany the traditional pre-wedding immersion but immerse in the mikveh to mark other major lifecycle events, both positive and negative, including birth, death, marriage and divorce; they also perceive it as a source of physical and emotional healing, e.g., after a miscarriage or abortion, while undergoing fertility or cancer treatments, or to help in the recovery from rape or sexual abuse. Even some Orthodox women, primarily in mysticism-oriented circles, immerse during the ninth month of pregnancy (an act not prescribed by halakhah), viewing it as propitious for an easy childbirth; a childless woman may immerse immediately after the pregnant woman, or after a woman immersing for the first time since giving birth, as a spiritual remedy for infertility. Conversely, some non-Orthodox women have begun to visit the mikveh each month, viewing the traditional use of the mikveh as a way to enhance the sanctity of their marital relationship.
Additionally, contemporary Jewish women artists have begun to include, or even focus on, the mikveh experience in their work, some interpreting it as an oppressive and patriarchial element of traditional Judaism, others reframing it as a celebration of femininity and feminist principles. Mierele Laderman Ukeles installed a full-size ritual bath called “Mikveh: Place of Kissing Waters” for a 1986 show at the Jewish Museum, Na’amah Batya Lewin explored her ambivalence about mikveh observance in her 1998 film “Cycle: The Mikveh,” and Helen Aylon created “My Bridal Chamber” in 2001, part of her ongoing artistic exploration of the place of women in traditional text and ritual. “Tehorah,” Israeli Anat Zuria’s documentary on family purity, was screened in New York in 2004. “The Mikvah Project,” which has toured the United States since 2001, is an exhibit created by photographer Janice Rubin and writer Leah Lax, which portrays close-up (but faceless) photos of women immersing in the mikveh in a variety of circumstances, ranging from a traditional monthly visit to a woman’s ritualistic declaration of her identity as a lesbian. The photos are accompanied by quotations from the women, expressing the personal effects of integrating immersion into their spiritual lives.
Although the observance of niddah and regular attendance at the mikveh remain minority practices among contemporary Jewish women, the meaning of this centuries-old Jewish ritual continues to evolve along with the needs and values of Jewish women.
Adler, Rachel. “Tuma and Tahara: Ends and Beginnings.” In The Jewish Woman: New Perspectives, edited by Elizabeth Koltun (1976): 63–71; Cohen, Debra Nussbaum. “From Old Springs, New Currents.” Hadassah December 2001 Vol. 83 No.4, and “Mikvah’s Next Wave” and “The Art of Immersion,” The Jewish Week, August 17, 2001; Diner, Hasia. A Time for Gathering: The Second Migration, 1820–1880 (1992): 124–125, 136; “The Earliest Extant Minute Book of the Spanish and Portuguese Congregation Shearith Israel in New York.” Publications of the American Jewish Historical Society 21 (1913): 81; EJ, CD-Rom ed., s.v. “mikveh”; Greenberg, Blu. On Women and Judaism: A View from Tradition (1981): 105–123; Heinze, Andrew R. Adapting to Abundance: Jewish Immigrants, Mass Consumption, and the Search for American Identity (1990): 57–58; Hutt v’Dodd, Evelyn. “The Ways We Are.” Lilith (Winter 1976–1977): 7–9; Joselit, Jenna Weissman. New York’s Jewish Jews: The Orthodox Community in the Interwar Years (1990): 115–122, and The Wonders of America: Reinventing Jewish Culture, 1880–1950 (1994); Josephson, Manuel. “Petition to Build a Mikvah in Philadelphia (1784).” In The American Jewish Woman: A Documentary History, edited by Jacob Rader Marcus (1981): 134–136; Jung, Leo. The Jewish Way to Married Happiness (1930); Religion and Ethics Newsweekly, no. 640, June 6, 2003.