Discussing rape, the "sisterhood" fails
As someone who writes about reproductive rights and gets frustrated with the frequently encountered “abortion for me, but not for thee” syndrome, this all sounds very familiar. Some women think: I’m a good girl; she’s a slut. I took precautions; she was careless. We blame each other even when, as Amanda Marcotte points out sheer bad luck is the primary determining factor which leads women to end up in the path of a rapist, with an unintended pregnancy, or as a victim of harassment.
This kind of statistic leads me to think about the title of [the Sisterhood blog], and the Jewish women’s organizations it’s named after. “Sisterhood” presumes that women, just by virtue of being ourselves, can find value in socializing and working together. The truth is I’ve been feeling a bit of soft nostalgia for the principles behind an old-school sisterhood version of feminism, the kind that we third-wave, ironic young feminists sometimes distance ourselves from.
Sarah Seltzer is a regular contributor to the Sisterhood, which crossposts weekly with Jewesses with Attitude.
How to cite this page
Seltzer, Sarah. "Discussing rape, the "sisterhood" fails." 19 February 2010. Jewish Women's Archive. (Viewed on May 3, 2016) <http://jwa.org/blog/discussing-rape-the-sisterhood-fails>.